In criminal cases, the prosecution typically has the burden of proving its allegations beyond a reasonable doubt. Plaintiffs in civil cases typically have the burden of proving their allegations by a preponderance of the evidence. (And I do not see that there is another remedy to the problems we face.)Ī party’s duty is to produce sufficient evidence to support an allegation or argument. And we the people never anywhere have surrendered this power we have never been askedĪll citizens of the world have the right to resist any person group or cooperation seeking to abolish the fundamental democratic principles, should no other remedy be possible. The ultimate power comes from “we the people”. You can only give orders if the chain of command is upheld. In a national hierarchy like we have it is important to understand the chain of command. We the people can chose what kind of power we give to our elected leaders. We the people can take this power away from our democratic elected leaders. We the people give the power to or democratic elected leaders. The idea of control or power is central to the notion of democracy, since the ideal is one of giving kratos to the demos: giving maximal or at least significant control over government to the people. And that is based on the Law of Natural inalienable rights that no one can take away. There is a catch on which they fail and that is this: The ultimate power of a democratic Government comes from “We the people” anything different is illegal and as such all those are illegal and can be punished and detained by every citizen in this world.

Alex jones command and conquer